Saturday, September 27, 2008

The Future of Worship Music?

This post is inspired from a post made earlier by the Worship Guitar Guy on the same topic. He makes one important point about the definition of worship (borrowed from Louie Giglio) that it is our whole life response to God for who He is and what He's done (and continues to do) in us - waaaaaaaaay much more than music and song. Then he poses a bunch of questions to his readers and asks them to comment...

1. How will songwriting change (for you writers out there?) One criticism of some worship music is that it seems very “me-centered.” Should songwriting be more community focused and how can writers be more open to that thought?

I'm not sure if we will see any significant change in song-writing in the immediate future. I think it would be cool to see more lyrics of "we" and "us" in congregational worship. I think it's cool to be singing as one body and united as once voice and I would support a more community focused lyrical movement. I know that there are songs out there that you could sing to your girlfriend/boyfriend if only you replaced Jesus with their name (not very profound). However, it's tough and maybe unfair to criticize someone's songwriting inspiration because it could have come from a very personal and touching moment between the writer and God. For example, one song that comes to mind is "You Are My All in All" written by Dennis Jernigan. I remember reading that his inspiration for writing the song came from how God helped him through his struggles with homosexuality and helped him to find purpose, love and reassurance through Jesus Christ. I think it's very fitting that the song be personally centered on that intimate relationship between the believer and God and that there should continue to be a place for these "God-and-I centered" types of songs as well - maybe like a personal prayer to God.

2. Also, another issue suggested is that songwriting has been very simplistic in its thoughts and lyrical content. Do you see songwriters embracing much more “vivid imagery” in writing? Can you see more complexity in lyrical content or should lyrical content remain simple?

I have mixed feelings about the balance between simplicity and more complex "vivid imagery" in songs. I'm not sure more imagery is the solution. The words need to be simple enough for a congregation to catch onto quickly, remember and sing with ease (here i'm assuming that these are praise and/or worship songs that are written specifically for congregational use). If you have too many syllables crammed into each line and words that you need a dictionary to understand, people aren't going to connect with God during the singing. Getting the words flow easily with music is the trickiest part. You can have the best lyrics possible (pull a Psalm directly from the bible) but if you don't set it to a singable, catchy melody then it can be impossible to use effectively in corporate worship. Ultimately, you can't separate the words from the song and the music has to fit. I find Hillsong United songs are some of the easiest to learn, love and sing along to.

Recently, I've been listening to Valley of Visions by Sovereign Grace Music and the lyrics are pretty solid in all of the songs. Some songs are easier to sing along to and some are just...well...awkward. For example, I liked "In the Valley" and "Let Your Kingdom Come"; I did not like "I Come Running", "It Was Your Grace", "Heavenly Father, Beautiful Son", "It Was Love"...actually most of rest were pretty tough to catch onto (nevermind lead in church). I think if I need to listen to song more than 5 times before I can figure out how to sing it, it's too complicated. That means the song will have to be introduced and sung at least 5 times in service before the average person with a bit of musical background can sing the song comfortably without struggling through. Maybe it would work if everyone listened to the songs at home and/or to and from school/work throughout the week so that they were familiar with them come church service time. I love it when I can close my eyes, sing a song, and really focus on God because the melody and words are familiar.

This is where the really gifted songwriters stand out. Chris Tomlin, Paul Baloche, Matt Redman, Reuben Morgan - all have written many great, fairly simple, memorable, singable songs that are used in churches all over the world.

3. How will the role of singers and instrumentalists change? Are there additional ways we can begin to “decrease” so that the confessions of the songs and the focus on God “increases?”

Hmm...I think variety is good and that having a huge band/choir is not necessarily the best way to go all the time. Sometimes simple is good. One idea that I remember reading about was to remove the stage-presence of the music team, put them in a pit or maybe off to the side/back, and just stick a big cross at the front. That way people aren't potentially distracted by the singers or instrumentalists (what they're wearing, what they're doing, what kind of guitar they're using, wow that riff was neat how did he just play that <watch his fingers>...) and can instead focus on God. But I guess this has it's problems too because the leader needs to be seen to lead...

4. Bono is quoted as saying “Gospel tells us where we’re going, but the blues tell us where we are.” 2/3rds of the Psalms deal with issues of darkness and despair (obviously) faced by the psalmist. Is there a place for darker more introspective worship in a church setting? Can “the blues” (not necessarily the genre, but the thoughts behind it) become a greater part of corporate confession?

I remember hearing Tim Hughes speak at Breakforth 2006 about laments and how there are very few modern laments written. Reason? Well, it's probably cuz they're sad and depressing and people don't go to church to be sad and depressed...or do they? I've been pretty upset and depressed in church before and sang songs that didn't truly express how I was feeling at the time...I remember crying in the middle of a sermon once and having to leave to recompose myself because I felt that there was something wrong with being upset or showing negative emotions. My guess is that when we sing songs like "Oh Happy Day" there are heaps of people in the congregation that may not be feeling so happy at that moment. Why not give these people an opportunity to cry out to God in their struggles and sorrows? I would like to see a place and context for laments and songs that may not be all happy happy joy joy in corporate worship - a "holy blues" perhaps?

One thing is for sure, there sure won't be any shortage of fresh and new material coming forth. I am confident that we will continue to "Sing to Him a new song" as the psalmist writes...

My humble rig down under: G&L Legacy --> Ts9 --> Echo Park --> Blackheart 5W Class A tube head + 1x12 Eminence speaker cab

Labels: ,

Thursday, September 25, 2008

The House of God

Despite having "God" in the title, this book has absolutely nothing to do with God (well, maybe not absolutely nothing but pretty close to nothing...the book itself does highlight in my mind a need for God in our lives with all the crap that can and often does fly through the air at us). Yes, you read correctly, I'm talking about a book that I read that isn't a textbook. Now although I've never considered reading to be an interest of mine, I find that I do enjoy reading if I can settle myself down to read (I have the attention span of a six-year old) and not fall asleep immediately.

So two of my flatmates had read 'The House of God' and, since I heard that it's a must read for anyone considering/beginning a career path in medicine, decided to give it a go. Throughout the book I often found myself unimpressed with the sexual references and had to periodically remind myself of the satirical nature of the book when I hit those super dark and ugly portions. In hindsight I do not regret reading the book (it had many funny and clever moments) but there were a couple of times early on that I considered putting it down and not continuing due to Dr. Basch's dark cynicism and objectification of women.

Will I be able to handle living the rest of my life working with sick, old and/or dying people? The very fact that I'll be seeing them means that something's wrong with them. Only time will tell but I hope that knowing God's purpose for my life will keep me on track...and if not then hopefully I'll have a support group of people around to hold me together through the rough patches.

Laws of the House of God: (courtesy of the fat man)

1. Gomers don't die
2. Gomers go to ground
3. At a cardiac arrest, the first procedure is to take your own pulse
4. The patient is the one with the disease
5. Placement comes first
6. There is no body cavity that cannot be reached with a #14 needle and a good strong arm
7. Age + BUN = Lasix dose
8. They can always hurt you more
9. The only good admission is a dead admission
10. If you don't take a temperature, you can't find a fever
11. Show me a BMS (best medical student from the best medical school) who only triples my work and I will kiss his feet
12. If the radiology resident and the medical student both see a lesion on the chest x-ray, there can be no lesion there
13. The delivery of good medical care is to do as much nothing as possible

Perhaps I will start posting more about what I read. I have gone through a really small book called 'Nothing in My Hand I Bring' by Ray Galea that compares the differences between Roman Catholic and Protestant beliefs. A very quick and easy read and I would recommend it for anyone who isn't sure of what the differences are. I think next on my list is free book I got by Dr. KP Yohannan called 'Revolution in World Missions'. Until then, it's off to read all about rheumatology... x_x

Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Cry Holy

One of my favorite Christian bands is Sonicflood and one of my favorite songs of theirs is "Cry Holy." I've always thought that it would be a great song for a call to worship.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Sarah Palin & Hillary Clinton

Hahahaha, Tina Fey does a great job as Sarah Palin on SNL...

Labels: , ,

Monday, September 15, 2008

Bridge to Brisbane 2008

This picture was taken right before I crossed the finish line at 51:31 which is under my original goal to do the 10km in under 60 min. I think I can do a bit better though - maybe I will try to beat it in 2009 =)

Labels: ,

Sunday, September 14, 2008

I <3 Baptisms

I love witnessing baptisms and hearing testimonies. Today I had a chance to see how baptisms are done by Chinese Christian Church Brisbane as four brothers and one sister took that step of obedience and were baptized in front of many family and friends this afternoon. It was really cool to hear how God revealed Himself to these people, how God changed their lives, what they had to go through in order to reach where they are today and to see that they have decided to follow Jesus all the days of their life! We were all there to celebrate and hopefully we can all help them to continue to run the race to win the prize and keep them on track! Congratz to all!


I was happy to see that CCCB encourages water baptism by immersion. Of the various forms that I've come across (sprinkling and pouring come to mind), immersion definitely seems symbolically more significant and I would recommend it. I remember talking to a pastor back home about the various forms and he was okay with other methods and gave me some biblical support for sprinkling and pouring from the old testament. He talked a bit about the meaning of the Greek "baptizo":

1) to dip repeatedly, to immerse, to submerge (of vessels sunk)
2) to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water, to wash one's self, bathe
3) to overwhelm

This past year my church did a baptismal ceremony at a community wave pool. We booked out pool at like 6:30am on a Sunday morning before it opened up to the public and did it there. Seeing a few girls from the young adult fellowship group get baptized in the ocean at camp was also awesome.

Is immersion necessary? I've come across a few churches that insist on water baptism by immersion and will often require people to be re-baptized if another method was previously used. I personally think immersion is best but not absolutely necessary. What if the person is confined to a wheelchair? Or what if they have a medical condition where they can't be place into water? Like perhaps if they are bedridden and immunocompromised and want to be baptized? I think using sprinkling or pouring in those cases are okay. Baptism itself is not a determinant of salvation (and baptism without true repentance is meaningless). It's supposed to symbolize doing away with, or washing away, our old sinful lives and having our new lives in Christ. Whether a person is baptized with a sprinkle of water, a swimming pool full of water, or dunked into an ocean does not change the fact that they are included into God's family. I think that this relational aspect is key and that methodology of baptism should not be a divisive or exclusion factor within the church!

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Birds, Cats and Kids

Oh the press is a funny entity indeed. So the Globe posts this article about how an oil spill from a conventional out-of-service oil well has killed 500 birds somewhere in Alberta and everyone is outraged at the evil oil and gas industry and it's senseless destruction of the environment. It's funny to hear about how people are so outraged about the death of 500 birds from this accident when oil and gas extraction rank 9th on the list of bird killers in the United States. I don't know how accurate this source is but according to Curry & Kerlinger, the best way to kill a bird is to use a glass window (of course spotlessly cleaned with Windex or some other comparable product).

#1. Glass Windows - 100-900+ million/yr
#2. House Cats - 100 million/yr (7 million/yr in Wisconsin alone - man those Wisconsin cats are vicious!)
#3. Automobiles/Trucks - 50-100 million/yr.
#4. Electric Transmission Line Collisions - up to 174 million/yr
#5. Agriculture - 67 million/yr
#6. Land Development - unknown (from destruction of bird habitat)
#7. Communication Towers - 4-10 million/yr
#8. Stock Tank Drowning - unknown, but sources say that a fair number of birds drown in livestock water tanks...natural selection in action
#9. Oil and Gas Extraction - 1-2 million/yr (as reported by the US Fish and Wildlife Service from birds landing in oil pits to bathe/drink. No estimates for deaths caused by spills and transporting oil and gas.

I walked past a dead bird on the side of the street just the other day AND I ate chicken curry last night for dinner. Add another 2 birds to the list for this year.

What's not funny and just really sad is that 2,880 African children die from malaria every day (one every 30 seconds) and we don't read about that very often in the news. Now I'm not saying a "lesser evil" is not evil, but let's rethink the priority of our concerns here. We get upset at how un-environmentally friendly the oil and gas industry is (when we all use plastic products, vehicles, or electricity) and call 500 birds dying a catastrophe. I wonder what millions of children dying from malnutrition each year is called? I guess awareness is a start but where do we go from here? How can we actually do something about it? How can I act to make a difference? I mean, it's not like these are incurable conditions like HIV/AIDS or cancer. WE HAVE THE CURE!! It's food and resources to get food to people! It's primaquine/mefloquine/chloroquine/doxycycline/mosquito nets/bug spray/etc! What's the hold up?!? ARGH!!!!

The book of Proverbs has some words of wisdom about looking after those in need. I really pray that these words won't fall on my deaf ears and that I will be able to live out my life in such a way that listens to the cries of the poor and defenseless and does something about it.

"He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God." -
Prov 14:31 (NIV)
"If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered." - Prov 21:13 (NIV)
"The righteous care about justice for the poor, but the wicked have no such concern." -
Prov 29:7 (NIV)
"Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy." -
Prov 31:8-9 (NIV)


The Final Judgment (Matt 25:31-46, NLT)

“But when the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit upon his glorious throne. All the nations will be gathered in his presence, and he will separate the people as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will place the sheep at his right hand and the goats at his left.

“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the creation of the world. For I was hungry, and you fed me. I was thirsty, and you gave me a drink. I was a stranger, and you invited me into your home. I was naked, and you gave me clothing. I was sick, and you cared for me. I was in prison, and you visited me.’

“Then these righteous ones will reply, ‘Lord, when did we ever see you hungry and feed you? Or thirsty and give you something to drink? Or a stranger and show you hospitality? Or naked and give you clothing? When did we ever see you sick or in prison and visit you?’

“And the King will say, ‘I tell you the truth, when you did it to one of the least of these my brothers and sisters, you were doing it to me!’

“Then the King will turn to those on the left and say, ‘Away with you, you cursed ones, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his demons. For I was hungry, and you didn’t feed me. I was thirsty, and you didn’t give me a drink. I was a stranger, and you didn’t invite me into your home. I was naked, and you didn’t give me clothing. I was sick and in prison, and you didn’t visit me.’

“Then they will reply, ‘Lord, when did we ever see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and not help you?’

“And he will answer, ‘I tell you the truth, when you refused to help the least of these my brothers and sisters, you were refusing to help me.’

“And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous will go into eternal life.”


Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 07, 2008

One Issue Politics...

I was recently pointed to this article written by John Piper on the challenge of deciding who to vote for when there are some issues for each candidate that you disagree with and some that you agree with. Especially when it comes down to moral issues. Should I vote for a candidate who seems best fit to run the country even though I might have some serious disagreements with their stance on various moral issues (Roe vs. Wade or stem cell research for example)? It's a tough choice and one that I have not found a simple answer to.

Basically, Piper talks about how there is no single issue that, if supported by a politician, automatically makes them the best choice. However, he states that there may be single qualities that, if held by a politician, would immediately disqualify them from any chance of being elected. He gave one example of being racist against African-Americans. Automatic zero chance of being elected. He draws a comparison with marriage and how there isn't really anything that automatically qualifies a man or woman to be the perfect soul mate. But, everyone has their list of qualities that they would not tolerate. Smoking would be an example for me. Nothing against smokers but I would not date someone who smoked. Interesting food for thought...

Labels: ,

Friday, September 05, 2008

A Time to Vote?

Aussie spring is just around the corner, the school year is wrapping up, and elections are in the air. No, I'm not talking about the American November 4th election that will place either McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden in charge. I'm referring to what could be an early Canadian federal election - as soon as Oct 14 if Harper gets the governor general to dissolve parliament this weekend.

I've been trying to read-up on the happenings at the Democratic and Republican conventions and it's just so much more interesting than what goes on in Canadian politics. I probably know a whole heck of a lot more about Sarah Palin than I do about Stephane Dion. I don't know if I can say 10 interesting things about the Liberal leader...born in Paris, ex-poli sci prof, environmentally friendly, Liberal leader for not quite 2 yrs, uhh...ya, that's about it. For Ms. Palin she's a hockey mom, has 5 kids (the youngest of whom has Downs who was diagnosed in utero), has a daughter who is pregnant and unmarried (okay, no more about her family - Obama says it's "off-limits"), lifetime NRA member, 1st term governor, 2nd place in a Miss Alaska pageant, baptized Roman Catholic as a child --> re-baptized at an Assemblies of God church --> now attends a non-denominational church, pro-life (supports abortion if mother's life is seriously threatened), pro-capital punishment, against same-sex marriage, huge supporter of oil and gas development in Alaska, and has virtually nothing on foreign policy. Yes, I know this is just cuz there's so much more news about her since the Republican National Convention and there is basically nothing very stimulating about reading up on Canadian politics and politicians.

Now I don't know much when it comes to politics. I try to make an informed vote when it comes to election time but honestly, I don't really keep track of what goes on at Parliament Hill. I know GST went down to 5% at the beginning of 2008 (which is the only tax we pay in Alberta...yeehaw!) but I can honestly not think of much else the government has done lately. But in the end, how important is the person that we elect to be head of state? I mean, they sure aren't going to be making decisions by themselves. They get stuck out in the spotlight to be cheer or jeered when in the end, they are nothing but puppets of the larger political party. You would hope that the party leader would be a good reflection of the party itself but part of me feels that if I identify myself with say republican ideals (like less gov't involvement and more personal liberty), then I vote for the party and not necessarily that one person. I guess in the American system that is much different with the power of the executive branch...

I find this Sarah Palin decision very puzzling (surprise surprise). I don't find this to be a very wise move by the Republicans...yes, I agree that it's good to get some fresh faces into the government - faces that don't just resort to doing some political masquerade to stay in office. But when I see pictures of Dick Cheney representing the US by talking to Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko and Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, I wonder if Palin, this 44 yo small town politician who has yet to travel outside of the United States, is up to the challenges of her potential vice-president role? Then again, Obama doesn't have much foreign policy experience either (especially compared to McCain) and he's running for President. Definitely a bold move by the Repulicans and I can't wait to see how America responds.

I won't be back in Canada for an October election but I should still be able to vote from Australia. Elections Canada has a place where I should be able to go and fill out the necessary information to exercise my democratic right to vote!

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Knee - Special Tests

I was shown how to do the anterior/posterior drawer tests and to test the MCL and LCL. Here are a few more that I had to learn from Dr. Mark Hutchinson =)

1. Lachman's test (anterior cruciate)



2. McMuray's test (medial/lateral meniscal tear)
- looking for a click and pop associated w/ pain



3. Apley's grinding test (meniscal damage)
- pretty much the same as McMurray's except done prone instead of supine



4. Patella tap (large effusions) and Bulge test (small effusions)
- he does the bulge test first and then the tap

Labels:

The Shoulder Examination

I am making yet another attempt at "teach yourself medicine" as I try to figure out all these special MSK tests that I have not actually been shown how to do by anyone and yet am responsible for knowing how to do them. Thanks for the help YouTube!

1. Apprehension Test

Can this be performed while standing? It looks so much easier lying supine...



2. Hawkins Test



3. Empty Can Test

For this one, the video shows it done at 90º shoulder flexion but my notes say at 90º shoulder abduction... =(

Labels: